The secret lies in the fact that distinguished institutions have realized the secret of the institutional excellence industry, and walked on its path, step by step until it achieved the desired excellence and quality, and the institutional excellence industry goes through five stages and sequential steps until the institution achieves the highest possible level of quality of performance.
The first stage in the excellence industry: It is the stage in which a team is formed within the institution to lead the quality of performance and develop its institutional performance, and this team must carry out the necessary awareness of the importance of achieving excellence and quality in performance, and it must build a supportive culture for institutional development with the support of the senior management of the institution, and it must also develop comprehensive perceptions and plans to achieve the development of school performance to meet the aspirations of its employees and society in general.
Self-assessment phase
The second stage in the institutional excellence industry: It is the stage of self-evaluation of the institution, and there is no doubt that this step and that stage is the most important and dangerous towards achieving excellence and the desired quality of performance within institutions, through the self-evaluation process, the institution can identify strengths, weaknesses, the amount of opportunities and the size of threats internally and externally “SWOT Analysis” in various fields of work, and the strength of self-evaluation also lies in that it enables each institution to identify its current situation, capabilities and different capabilities, as well as Its needs and requirements towards achieving excellence and the desired quality in performance, based on the reference of quality assurance standards. At this stage, the strengths of performance that need to be strengthened and supported to ensure their continuity are identified, and the weaknesses and defects that need to be developed and improved in order to overcome them and turn them into strengths as well.
Know the strengths
The third stage: the stage of determining the priorities of institutional development, in which the strengths of institutional performance were known, and the aspects that need to be developed and improved, and at this stage the performance gaps that most negatively affect the productivity of the institution and achieve its goals are identified in accordance with its vision and mission, and the reasons for these gaps are discussed, and appropriate decisions are taken with development priorities, i.e. determining the starting point in development and improvement, and determining the next steps according to importance, need and public interest.
Formation of the work team
The fourth stage: the stage of designing and preparing the procedural plan for the development of institutional performance, and here the work team is formed capable of building such plans, determining the timetable necessary for managing and implementing this plan, determining the general objectives of school development, and the levels of performance expected to be reached by the end of achieving and implementing the plan on the ground, as well as determining work strategies, distributing roles and responsibilities, and determining success indicators in achieving the goals of the plan and the time required for implementation and follow-up.
Formation of a performance monitoring and evaluation team
The fifth stage: the stage of follow-up and evaluation of performance related to the implementation of the procedural plan for the development of institutional performance, and here a team is formed to follow up and evaluate performance, and raise awareness of the methods of follow-up and evaluation of performances in accordance with the activities in the plan, as well as agree on the necessary follow-up mechanisms and tools, and agree on the quality of performances, evidence and evidence to be followed up and ensure their availability on the ground and how to analyze and evaluate them to take appropriate decisions about them, in order to ensure the continuity of performance development in order to reach the highest possible level of indicators of Daman standards Quality in Institutional Performance